What can cause a delay in the affirmative start of the Speedy Trial Clock (STC)?

The affirmative start of the Speedy Trial Clock (STC) may be delayed by any form of pretrial motion. When a defendant or their legal team files a pretrial motion—such as motions to suppress evidence, change venue, or request additional discovery—these actions can necessitate hearings or further legal considerations that take time to resolve. Under the law, the time while these motions are pending does not count against the Speedy Trial Clock, as the court recognizes the need to provide adequate time to address complex legal issues before the trial begins.

This delay is significant because it ensures that the rights of the defendant are protected and that the trial can proceed fairly and without unnecessary haste. Moreover, it underscores the importance of a thorough pretrial process, which can lead to more just outcomes. The other options are generally circumstances that would not necessarily lead to a delay of the Speedy Trial Clock, as they do not involve formal legal motions or significant proceedings that extend the timeline.