What factor is NOT considered in the determination of personal jurisdiction?

In determining personal jurisdiction, the primary factors typically assessed include the defendant's connections to the forum state, such as where the defendant resides, conducts business, or where the events giving rise to the claim occurred. Among the options presented, security clearance is not a factor typically considered in establishing personal jurisdiction.

Personal jurisdiction focuses on the ability of a court to exercise authority over a person based on their activities and ties to the jurisdiction in question. Rates, ranks, commands, and avenues of service may relate to how a court interacts with a defendant, particularly in terms of notification and engagement with the legal process.

In contrast, security clearance pertains to an individual's eligibility to access classified information, which is not relevant to the jurisdictional issues that courts handle when determining whether they can exercise legal authority over an individual. Thus, security clearance stands apart from the critical criteria used to establish personal jurisdiction.