What is bifurcation in a trial?

Bifurcation in a trial refers specifically to the process of splitting a trial into two separate parts. This approach is often utilized to distinguish between different issues in a case, most commonly separating the determination of liability from the assessment of damages. By bifurcating a trial, the court can first focus on whether the defendant is liable for the alleged wrongdoing. If liability is established, the second part of the trial can then address the appropriate damages that should be awarded to the injured party.

This method can be beneficial as it allows the jury to concentrate on one aspect of the case at a time, potentially reducing complexity and confusion. Additionally, if the jury finds no liability in the first phase, there may be no need for the second phase regarding damages, thus saving time and resources for both the court and the parties involved.

Other options provided do not accurately describe bifurcation. The merger of two cases involves combining them into one, which is the opposite of what bifurcation aims to achieve. A procedure for dismissing a case refers to a completely different legal action that terminates proceedings without a trial. Lastly, while expediting trials may occur as a result of bifurcation, the term specifically pertains to the division of a trial rather