What is the difference between "mediation" and "arbitration"?

Prepare for the Legal Clerk Exam with our engaging multiple-choice questions. Benefit from clear explanations and hints for each question to enhance your understanding and boost your exam confidence!

Mediation fundamentally differs from arbitration in that it serves as a facilitated negotiation process rather than a judicial one. In mediation, a neutral third party, the mediator, helps the disputing parties try to reach a mutual agreement. The key characteristic of mediation is that it does not result in a binding decision; rather, it empowers the parties to control the outcome of their dispute, making it a collaborative process.

In contrast, arbitration is a more formal process where an arbitrator acts similarly to a judge, reviewing the evidence presented by both parties and making a binding decision that resolves the dispute. The outcome of arbitration is enforceable in a manner similar to a court judgment, meaning that the parties are obligated to comply with the arbitrator's decision.

Understanding this distinction clarifies that mediation focuses on cooperation and negotiation, while arbitration centers on a definitive ruling, which is why the correct choice accurately captures the essence of how these two dispute resolution processes operate.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy